National Centre for Domestic Violence Logo

Please note that Internet Explorer is no longer a supported browser so we cannot guarantee the integrity of our website when using it. Please use an alternate browser like Edge or Chrome.

Access ASSIST Online Injunction Database

Click here to leave training feedback

-or-

Make a Referral Using the Form Below:









    YesNo


    YesNo
    *Fields required. By submitting a referral you agree to receive updates on the progress of your referral, as outlined in our Privacy Policy.

    Women’s History Month: Why it matters

    emblem
    Reading Time: 3 minutes

    March marks Women’s History Month, a time to recognise the achievements, struggles and contributions of women across history. But this month did not begin as a celebration. It began as a protest. Let me give you a whistle-stop tour.

     

    How Women’s History Month began

    Women’s History Month grew out of International Women’s Day, celebrated on March 8th and first observed in the early 20th century amid labour movements and women’s campaigns for political rights. In the United States, a local Women’s History Week was first organised in 1978 in California. By 1987, March had officially been designated Women’s History Month. Since then, the observance has expanded globally, with different countries marking March as a time to reflect on women’s progress, and the barriers that remain.

    The month exists for one simple reason:

    Women’s contributions have historically been minimised, overlooked or erased. Women’s History Month corrects that silence.

     

    The 2026 theme

    The 2026 Women’s History Month theme is expected to focus on women’s leadership, representation and the ongoing fight for equity in social, political and economic life (official announcements vary internationally, and themes differ by organisation).

    Whatever the precise wording, the message is consistent:

    • Women belong in history.
    • Women belong in power.
    • Women belong in the narrative.

     

    Why this matters in the context of domestic abuse

    At NCDV, we support everyone, regardless of gender, but we receive many more referrals from women. There may be reasons for this and we’re working hard to ensure men feel able to disclose and seek help. But that being said, we hear every day how women’s voices can be silenced, not just in history books, but in homes, workplaces and communities.

    Domestic abuse is not only physical violence. It is coercion. Control. Isolation. Economic restriction. Emotional harm. It is the systematic shrinking of a woman’s autonomy and agency.

    When we talk about Women’s History Month, we are also talking about:

      • The history of women fighting for legal protections.
      • The long struggle to have domestic abuse recognised as a crime.
      • The campaign to move violence against women from “private matter” to public policy issue.
      • The work of survivors who have shaped legislation, services and safeguarding practice.

    The Domestic Abuse Act 2021 did not appear overnight. It exists because women organised, spoke out and refused to be invisible. Women’s history is not separate from domestic abuse policy. It is intertwined with it.

     

    Remembering the women who built the sector

    The domestic abuse sector was built by women. Refuges were opened by women. Helplines were staffed by women. For many years, much of it was unpaid work. I began as a volunteer. I was so passionate that I volunteered around my full-time work and bringing up two young children. In collaboration with other amazing women, we ran a 24hr helpline, and secured funding to build a refuge from scratch. I well remember the site visits, wearing my hard hat, and working late into the night to make sure we launched and opened on time.

    Alongside the many women working for little or nothing to push the domestic abuse movement forward, research was conducted by women who insisted that violence in the home was not a “relationship issue” but a rights issue.

    Women’s History Month is a reminder that the protections many take for granted were fought for. I was there. And those rights are still fragile.

     

    Why it still matters

    Some may ask whether we still need Women’s History Month. Globally, women remain disproportionately affected by domestic abuse and sexual violence. Economic inequality persists. Political representation remains uneven. And online abuse is reshaping how misogyny is experienced.

    History is not finished.

    At NCDV, our work sits within that longer historical arc, the ongoing movement to ensure women’s safety, dignity and equality under the law.

    Women’s History Month is not just about looking back.

    It is about asking:

    What kind of history are we building now?

     

    Charlotte Woodward

    Head of Training & Development, NCDV

    Share This Article

    Reading Time: 3 minutes
    Reading Time: 2 minutes
    Reading Time: 3 minutes

    By Fiona Bawden, Times Online (8th May 2007)

    “Steve Connor, a student at City Law School, is a man on a mission. Six years ago he was a fairly directionless 27-year-old. Today, as well as taking the Bar Vocational Course, he is chairman of the National Centre for Domestic Violence, a ground-breaking organisation that he dragged into existence after a friend could not get legal help to protect her from an abusive partner.

    Connor’s route to the Bar has been circuitous. In 2001 he returned from a year in Australia (he says that he would not dignify describing it as a gap year), and took a job as a process server in South London. The job (“I just saw it advertised in the paper”) was not quite as dull as it sounds. On one occasion he was threatened with a machete, on another, he was nearly stabbed by a man he had arranged to meet on Clapham Common to serve with a non-molestation order: “He’d seemed really friendly on the phone…”

    The turning point in his life came when a friend, who was being abused by her partner, turned to him for support. Connor went with her to the police. She did not want to press criminal charges so the police suggested that she visit a solicitor to take out a civil injunction. “We must have seen 12 solicitors in a morning. We just went from one to the next to the next to the next. Everyone was very eager to help until we sat down to fill in the forms for the legal aid means test,” he says. The woman, who had a small child, did not qualify for public funding. But, Connor says, her financial situation as it appeared on paper did not bear any relation to her financial situation in reality. “She had a part-time job and she and her partner owned their home. Yet she didn’t have any money. Her boyfriend was very controlling and controlled all the money; he kept the chequebooks and didn’t let her have access to the bank account.”

    The injustice of the situation got under Connor’s skin. “I just couldn’t believe that there was no help available to people who did not qualify for public funds but could not afford to pay.

    I just kept feeling that this must be able to be sorted if only someone would address it.”That “someone” turned out to be him.

    In 2002, thanks entirely to Connor’s doggedness, the London Centre for Domestic Violence was formed. It started out with him and a friend, but is now a national organisation, covering 27 counties, and has helped approximately 10,000 victims last year to take out injunctions against their partners.

    NCDV now has nine full-time staff, 12 permanent volunteers and has trained over 5000 law and other students as McKenzie Friends to accompany unrepresented victims into court. We have also trained over 8000 police officers in civil remedies available regarding domestic violence. The National Centre for Domestic Violence (NCDV) has branches in London, Guildford and Manchester and is on track to have branches in 16 areas within the next two years.

    NCDV specialises exclusively in domestic violence work and could be characterised as a cross between McDonald’s and Claims Direct. The high degree of specialisation means that its processes are streamlined: clients can be seen quickly and the work is done speedily and cheaply. “Sometimes, we will have one of our trained McKenzie Friends at a court doing 10 applications in one day,” Connor says.

    Clients are not charged for the service. NCDV staff take an initial statement: clients who qualify for legal aid are referred to a local firm; those that don’t get free help from the centre itself. It runs on a shoestring, heavily reliant on volunteers and capping staff salaries at £18,000 a year.

    Steve expects to qualify as a barrister this summer and hopes that having a formal legal qualification will give the centre added clout. “We are already acknowledged as experts and consulted at a high level, so I thought it would be helpful if I could back that up by being able to say I’m a barrister,” he says. He is just about to complete a one-year full-time BVC course at the City Law School (formerly the Inns of Court Law School) and, all being well, should be called to the Bar in July. Although Connor sees his long-term future as a barrister, he says that he has no immediate plans to practise. “I want to get NCDV running on a fully national level. Then I may take a step back and have a career at the Bar.”