National Centre for Domestic Violence Logo

Please note that Internet Explorer is no longer a supported browser so we cannot guarantee the integrity of our website when using it. Please use an alternate browser like Edge or Chrome.

Access ASSIST Online Injunction Database

Click here to leave training feedback

-or-

Make a Referral Using the Form Below:









    YesNo


    YesNo
    *Fields required. By submitting a referral you agree to receive updates on the progress of your referral, as outlined in our Privacy Policy.

    From “Private Matter” to Public Protection: The women who changed domestic abuse law

    emblem
    Reading Time: 2 minutes

    We are still in March, which is Women’s History Month. This blog shines a spotlight on women who helped change the law.

    For much of modern history, violence in the home was considered a private issue. Police were reluctant to intervene. Courts were inconsistent. Survivors were often advised to “go home and work it out.”

    Domestic abuse was not viewed as a systemic issue. It was minimised, normalised or ignored. That changed because women organised. During Women’s History Month, it is important to recognise that the domestic abuse protections available today exist because women challenged silence.

     

    The Early Movement

    In the 1970s, grassroots activists across the UK began opening refuges in ordinary houses. They documented patterns of abuse. They gathered evidence. They reframed what was happening, not as individual relationship breakdowns, but as structural violence. These early campaigners shifted the narrative. They argued that coercion, intimidation and economic restriction were not “marital problems” but they were forms of harm and criminality.

    That reframing laid the foundation for legal change.

     

    Legal progress and ongoing gaps

    Over the decades, domestic abuse law has evolved. Protective injunctions became more accessible. Coercive and controlling behaviour was criminalised in 2015. The Domestic Abuse Act 2021 broadened definitions and strengthened protections.

    These milestones were not inevitable. They were the result of sustained advocacy, research and survivor testimony. However, legislation alone does not guarantee safety. Barriers to access remain. Awareness varies. Referral pathways are inconsistent across regions. History shows us that progress must be continually defended or can begin to be rolled back.

     

    The role of services today

    Services like NCDV sit within that longer historical movement. Each time a professional recognises risk and makes a referral, whatever the gender, they are acting within a framework that was shaped by decades of women’s advocacy.

    Each time a protective order is secured swiftly, it reflects legal tools that did not always exist. Women’s History Month is not only about looking back at what was achieved. It is about ensuring that the protections fought for remain accessible in practice.

    Building the next chapter

    The domestic abuse sector was built through persistence, research, frontline insight and survivor courage.

    The next chapter depends on:

    • Consistent referral practice
    • Trauma-informed responses
    • Early intervention
    • Professional confidence in using legal protections
    • Continued scrutiny of gaps in provision

     

    History teaches us that change is possible when evidence and advocacy meet.

    As we mark Women’s History Month, we recognise not only the women who built the foundations of domestic abuse protection, but the professionals and survivors continuing that work today.

    The story is still being written.

    Charlotte Woodward,

    Head of Training & Development, NCDV

    Share This Article

    Reading Time: 3 minutes
    Reading Time: 3 minutes
    Reading Time: 5 minutes

    By Fiona Bawden, Times Online (8th May 2007)

    “Steve Connor, a student at City Law School, is a man on a mission. Six years ago he was a fairly directionless 27-year-old. Today, as well as taking the Bar Vocational Course, he is chairman of the National Centre for Domestic Violence, a ground-breaking organisation that he dragged into existence after a friend could not get legal help to protect her from an abusive partner.

    Connor’s route to the Bar has been circuitous. In 2001 he returned from a year in Australia (he says that he would not dignify describing it as a gap year), and took a job as a process server in South London. The job (“I just saw it advertised in the paper”) was not quite as dull as it sounds. On one occasion he was threatened with a machete, on another, he was nearly stabbed by a man he had arranged to meet on Clapham Common to serve with a non-molestation order: “He’d seemed really friendly on the phone…”

    The turning point in his life came when a friend, who was being abused by her partner, turned to him for support. Connor went with her to the police. She did not want to press criminal charges so the police suggested that she visit a solicitor to take out a civil injunction. “We must have seen 12 solicitors in a morning. We just went from one to the next to the next to the next. Everyone was very eager to help until we sat down to fill in the forms for the legal aid means test,” he says. The woman, who had a small child, did not qualify for public funding. But, Connor says, her financial situation as it appeared on paper did not bear any relation to her financial situation in reality. “She had a part-time job and she and her partner owned their home. Yet she didn’t have any money. Her boyfriend was very controlling and controlled all the money; he kept the chequebooks and didn’t let her have access to the bank account.”

    The injustice of the situation got under Connor’s skin. “I just couldn’t believe that there was no help available to people who did not qualify for public funds but could not afford to pay.

    I just kept feeling that this must be able to be sorted if only someone would address it.”That “someone” turned out to be him.

    In 2002, thanks entirely to Connor’s doggedness, the London Centre for Domestic Violence was formed. It started out with him and a friend, but is now a national organisation, covering 27 counties, and has helped approximately 10,000 victims last year to take out injunctions against their partners.

    NCDV now has nine full-time staff, 12 permanent volunteers and has trained over 5000 law and other students as McKenzie Friends to accompany unrepresented victims into court. We have also trained over 8000 police officers in civil remedies available regarding domestic violence. The National Centre for Domestic Violence (NCDV) has branches in London, Guildford and Manchester and is on track to have branches in 16 areas within the next two years.

    NCDV specialises exclusively in domestic violence work and could be characterised as a cross between McDonald’s and Claims Direct. The high degree of specialisation means that its processes are streamlined: clients can be seen quickly and the work is done speedily and cheaply. “Sometimes, we will have one of our trained McKenzie Friends at a court doing 10 applications in one day,” Connor says.

    Clients are not charged for the service. NCDV staff take an initial statement: clients who qualify for legal aid are referred to a local firm; those that don’t get free help from the centre itself. It runs on a shoestring, heavily reliant on volunteers and capping staff salaries at £18,000 a year.

    Steve expects to qualify as a barrister this summer and hopes that having a formal legal qualification will give the centre added clout. “We are already acknowledged as experts and consulted at a high level, so I thought it would be helpful if I could back that up by being able to say I’m a barrister,” he says. He is just about to complete a one-year full-time BVC course at the City Law School (formerly the Inns of Court Law School) and, all being well, should be called to the Bar in July. Although Connor sees his long-term future as a barrister, he says that he has no immediate plans to practise. “I want to get NCDV running on a fully national level. Then I may take a step back and have a career at the Bar.”