National Centre for Domestic Violence Logo

Please note that Internet Explorer is no longer a supported browser so we cannot guarantee the integrity of our website when using it. Please use an alternate browser like Edge or Chrome.

Access ASSIST Online Injunction Database

Click here to leave training feedback

-or-

Make a Referral Using the Form Below:









    YesNo


    YesNo
    *Fields required. By submitting a referral you agree to receive updates on the progress of your referral, as outlined in our Privacy Policy.

    “I still can’t talk about my dog”: Breaking the silence around pets and domestic abuse

    Reading Time: 5 minutes

    “I still can’t talk about my dog”: Breaking the silence around pets and domestic abuse

    emblem

    Content note: this article includes non-graphic references to threats and harm to animals.

     

    I have lost count of the number of times I’ve witnessed genuine fear for the safety of family pets. Domestic abuse victims can be stuck in the nightmare of not being able to take them into emergency accommodation. But nor can they leave them behind, because their safety will be compromised, maybe even their lives.

    Those of us who have worked on the frontline know the challenges only too well. It becomes even more complex when it goes beyond dogs, cats and small animals – in rural areas it might be horses, chickens or goats too.

    There is an established link between domestic abuse and harm or threat to animals. This link has been backed up by repeated studies, and is reflected in NCDV’s own data set out in our 2025 report Family Pets & Domestic Abuse:

    We deeply love our pets, and perpetrators will exploit this, using animals to coerce or blackmail; as leverage; to prevent someone from leaving the relationship; or to force them to return. Pets can be targeted directly, threatened, abused, neglected, physically abused or killed. Others in the household, including children, are often forced to witness these horrors.

    People can be upfront and vocal about their concerns for their pets when they are fighting to keep them safe. But after the relationship ends, the voices often dry up. It’s difficult to open up. “I still can’t talk about my dog.”

    Not because it didn’t matter. Because it mattered too much.

     

    In the UK we don’t always talk easily about cruelty to animals, especially when it’s entangled with cruelty to people. Survivors tell us they fear judgement: “What kind of person stays after that?” or “Why didn’t you protect the children from seeing that?” As if the blame belongs with the person trying to survive, rather than the person choosing to harm.

    Shame thrives in that silence. So do abusers.

     

    When pets become part of the control

    For many families, a pet is the steady heartbeat of the home; warmth on the sofa, a reason to get up in the morning, a companion who makes an unsafe house bearable. Perpetrators know this. They exploit that bond to frighten, punish and trap. The message is clear: “Your love makes you vulnerable. I will use it.”

    We’ve read thousands of witness statements over the years. The patterns repeat: threats to “get rid” of the dog; locking the cat out in freezing weather so the child can hear it crying; refusing food or vet care as “discipline”; forcing the applicant to “choose” between safety and leaving the pet behind.

    None of that needs to be graphic to be devastating. It is coercive control, and it works.

    “I could cope with being kicked. I couldn’t cope when he tried to kick dog.”
    Applicant, anonymised

     

    The judgement survivors don’t deserve

    Survivors already carry too many accusations that are not theirs: Why didn’t you leave sooner? Why did you go back? Add a pet and the chorus grows: How could you let that happen? But a survivor’s options are often brutally limited by money, housing, immigration status, disability, childcare – and the reality that most emergency accommodation cannot accept animals. Love becomes a lever used against them.

    When we shame people who are being abused, we do the abuser’s job. We make disclosure less likely. We make planning harder. We make leaving riskier.

     

    Why we need to talk about it…carefully, kindly

    Silence doesn’t protect animals or people; it protects the abuser. When we bring pet-related abuse into the open, several things change:

    • Risk is recognised earlier. Threats or harm to pets are often a red flag for escalation and wider danger to adults and children.
    • Barriers become solvable. If we acknowledge the pet, we can plan—pet-friendly refuge spaces, safe fostering, boarding, transport, vet records.
    • Professionals are empowered. Vets, housing officers, teachers, social workers and police can spot patterns and signpost safely when they know what to look for.
    • Survivors feel believed. Naming the tactic validates the reality they’ve lived with—often in silence.

     

    What our data adds – and what it can’t show

    At NCDV we analysed 64,046 anonymised witness statements from adults seeking civil protection. 6.51% included an explicit mention of threats, harm or risk to pets. That figure is a conservative lower-bound—it reflects what made it into legal paperwork under pressure, not everything that happened at home. Survivor surveys often find higher rates. Put together, the message is simple: this is not rare, and it is not trivial.

     

    A different kind of “why didn’t you…?”

    When someone discloses that their partner threatened or hurt a pet, the most helpful questions are not, “Why didn’t you leave?” or “Why didn’t you stop it?” Try instead:

    • “Are you and your pet safe now?”
    • “What would make it possible for you to leave with your pet?”
    • “Can I help you connect with services that have pet-friendly options or trusted fostering?”

    Those questions move us from judgement to practical solidarity.

     

    If you’re a professional, here’s what helps

    • Ask about pets in risk assessments and safety planning. A simple “Do you have any pets? Are you worried about them?” can open the door without blame or pressure.
    • Record what you hear, in the survivor’s words, non-judgementally.
    • Know your pathways: local fostering schemes, refuges that accept animals, emergency boarding, how to reference pets in civil orders.
    • If you’re a vet or practice team, learn safe enquiry and signposting. A change in an animal’s behaviour, or an owner’s, can be an early warning.

     

    To anyone who recognises themselves

    If you’ve stayed because of a pet, you are not weak. You are loving. You were protecting someone who depends on you, with the options you had. The shame is not yours to carry.

    It is okay to ask for help that includes your pet. It is okay to say, “I can leave if my dog is safe.” It is okay to leave with your pet, or to make a plan where your pet is fostered safely until you can be reunited. There are people who understand that both of you matter.

     

    “My dog Poppy would protect me until her last breath. Fostering was hard, I missed her and worried about her a lot. But now we’re back together and I know I did my best to keep her safe.”
    Applicant, anonymised

     

    It’s okay to speak out

    As practitioners, we are ideally placed to reduce the shame and stigma by gently encouraging people to talk about the threats and harm to animals they witnessed in the past. Animals cannot speak up for themselves, but fear of judgement can remove the voice of the survivor too. We’re unlikely to hear someone talk about their pet being hurt or killed by an ex-partner, even if it was years ago. Even those closest to them might not be aware.

    This silence has delayed effective policy for decades, and although much work is now being done by the leaders in this field, there is still a long way to go.   

    We can support their voices by speaking out on this issue.

     

    Getting help

    If you’re concerned about your safety, you can contact NCDV for free, fast help with civil protection orders. In an emergency, always call 999.

     

    For information on pet fostering and the organisations that can help you:

     

    The Links Group

    Website: www.thelinksgroup.org.uk

    The Links Group is a national charity that raises awareness of the link between the abuse of people and animals through collaboration, research, training, and advocacy.

     

    Links Accredited fostering services:

    The Endeavour Project

    Website: endeavourproject.org.uk
    Provides confidential pet fostering for people escaping domestic abuse across the Northwest of England. Endeavour ensures animals are cared for in safe, loving homes until their owners can be reunited.

     

    Cats Protection Lifeline

    Website: cats.org.uk/what-we-do/cp-lifeline
    Offers free, confidential cat fostering for survivors of domestic abuse, enabling people to reach safety while their cats are cared for by trusted volunteers. Operates across multiple UK regions.

     

    Dogs Trust Freedom Project

    Website: dogstrustfreedomproject.org.uk
    Provides a free fostering service for dogs belonging to people fleeing domestic abuse. Dogs are temporarily placed with volunteer foster carers until their owners are rehoused and ready to be reunited.

     

    Refuge4Pets

    Website: refuge4pets.org.uk
    Supports people in Devon and Cornwall escaping domestic abuse by providing specialist fostering for any pet type — dogs, cats, or small animals. The service removes a key barrier to safety and recovery for survivors.

     

    Education, Campaigning and Training organisations:

     

    Loop and the Centre for Animal-Inclusive Safeguarding (Loop Safeguarding)

    Website: www.loop-safeguarding.org

    Protect Animals. Protect People (PAPP) – Naturewatch Foundation

    Website: www.naturewatch.org

     

    RSPCA

    Website: www.rspca.org.uk

    Provides advice, education and reporting routes for cruelty and neglect cases, with links to local branches.

     

     

    Charlotte Woodward

    Head of Training & Development, NCDV

    Share This Article

    Reading Time: 3 minutes
    Reading Time: 3 minutes
    Reading Time: 5 minutes

    By Fiona Bawden, Times Online (8th May 2007)

    “Steve Connor, a student at City Law School, is a man on a mission. Six years ago he was a fairly directionless 27-year-old. Today, as well as taking the Bar Vocational Course, he is chairman of the National Centre for Domestic Violence, a ground-breaking organisation that he dragged into existence after a friend could not get legal help to protect her from an abusive partner.

    Connor’s route to the Bar has been circuitous. In 2001 he returned from a year in Australia (he says that he would not dignify describing it as a gap year), and took a job as a process server in South London. The job (“I just saw it advertised in the paper”) was not quite as dull as it sounds. On one occasion he was threatened with a machete, on another, he was nearly stabbed by a man he had arranged to meet on Clapham Common to serve with a non-molestation order: “He’d seemed really friendly on the phone…”

    The turning point in his life came when a friend, who was being abused by her partner, turned to him for support. Connor went with her to the police. She did not want to press criminal charges so the police suggested that she visit a solicitor to take out a civil injunction. “We must have seen 12 solicitors in a morning. We just went from one to the next to the next to the next. Everyone was very eager to help until we sat down to fill in the forms for the legal aid means test,” he says. The woman, who had a small child, did not qualify for public funding. But, Connor says, her financial situation as it appeared on paper did not bear any relation to her financial situation in reality. “She had a part-time job and she and her partner owned their home. Yet she didn’t have any money. Her boyfriend was very controlling and controlled all the money; he kept the chequebooks and didn’t let her have access to the bank account.”

    The injustice of the situation got under Connor’s skin. “I just couldn’t believe that there was no help available to people who did not qualify for public funds but could not afford to pay.

    I just kept feeling that this must be able to be sorted if only someone would address it.”That “someone” turned out to be him.

    In 2002, thanks entirely to Connor’s doggedness, the London Centre for Domestic Violence was formed. It started out with him and a friend, but is now a national organisation, covering 27 counties, and has helped approximately 10,000 victims last year to take out injunctions against their partners.

    NCDV now has nine full-time staff, 12 permanent volunteers and has trained over 5000 law and other students as McKenzie Friends to accompany unrepresented victims into court. We have also trained over 8000 police officers in civil remedies available regarding domestic violence. The National Centre for Domestic Violence (NCDV) has branches in London, Guildford and Manchester and is on track to have branches in 16 areas within the next two years.

    NCDV specialises exclusively in domestic violence work and could be characterised as a cross between McDonald’s and Claims Direct. The high degree of specialisation means that its processes are streamlined: clients can be seen quickly and the work is done speedily and cheaply. “Sometimes, we will have one of our trained McKenzie Friends at a court doing 10 applications in one day,” Connor says.

    Clients are not charged for the service. NCDV staff take an initial statement: clients who qualify for legal aid are referred to a local firm; those that don’t get free help from the centre itself. It runs on a shoestring, heavily reliant on volunteers and capping staff salaries at £18,000 a year.

    Steve expects to qualify as a barrister this summer and hopes that having a formal legal qualification will give the centre added clout. “We are already acknowledged as experts and consulted at a high level, so I thought it would be helpful if I could back that up by being able to say I’m a barrister,” he says. He is just about to complete a one-year full-time BVC course at the City Law School (formerly the Inns of Court Law School) and, all being well, should be called to the Bar in July. Although Connor sees his long-term future as a barrister, he says that he has no immediate plans to practise. “I want to get NCDV running on a fully national level. Then I may take a step back and have a career at the Bar.”