National Centre for Domestic Violence Logo

Please note that Internet Explorer is no longer a supported browser so we cannot guarantee the integrity of our website when using it. Please use an alternate browser like Edge or Chrome.

Access ASSIST Online Injunction Database

Click here to leave training feedback

-or-

Make a Referral Using the Form Below:









    YesNo


    YesNo
    *Fields required. By submitting a referral you agree to receive updates on the progress of your referral, as outlined in our Privacy Policy.

    The Benefits of Protection Orders – How orders empower victims, prevent further abuse and provide breathing space to rebuild.

    Reading Time: 5 minutes

    The Benefits of Protection Orders – How orders empower victims, prevent further abuse and provide breathing space to rebuild.

    emblem

    What is a protection Order?

    A protection order is a legal measure designed to keep a person away from another with the aim to protect them from domestic abuse, harassment and threats of violence. They usually last a year, but ultimately the decision is up to the judge so they can be put in place anywhere from 6 months to an unbound duration and can be obtained through both civil and criminal courts.

    Non-Molestation Orders are the most common of protection orders and are obtained by the victim-survivor themselves via a solicitor (either privately paid or using legal aid funding) or self-representing as a litigant in person (there are no court costs for a non-molestation order).

    Civil orders can be obtained from local family or county courts such as:

    • Non-Molestation orders
    • Occupation orders
    • Prohibitive Steps orders
    • Domestic Abuse Protection orders or DAPOs (in the current pilot areas)
    • Harassment orders
    • Forced Marriage Protection orders

    Protective orders granted from the criminal courts are Restraining orders which are put in place following conviction or acquittal. From the magistrate courts Police can obtain Stalking Protection orders, Domestic Violence Protection Orders and Domestic Abuse Protection Orders (in pilot areas).

    Orders such as Restraining orders, Stalking Protection orders, DAPO’s and Non-Molestation orders have an automatic power of arrest attached to them, meaning it is a criminal offence if breached. A power of arrest can be placed on other orders by a judge if they deem it appropriate to do so, and others, if breached, can be dealt with under contempt of court.

     

    When did protection orders start?

    The first order of protection in the UK for domestic abuse was part of the Domestic Violence and Matrimonial Proceedings Act 1976, which provided legal remedies for those subjected to domestic violence, giving them new rights and to obtain injunctions to protect themselves and their families. Restraining orders followed under the Protection from Harassment Act 1997, and amendments made in 1997 to the Family Law Act 1996 introduced Non-Molestation and Occupation orders.

    The evolution of protective orders continued under the Domestic Violence, Crime & Victims Act with the breach of Non-Molestation and Occupation orders becoming a criminal offence in 2004. Further amendments were made to the Family Law Act 1996 under the Forced Marriage Act 2007 to include Forced Marriage Protection Orders. The Stalking Protection Act 2019 brought in Stalking Protection Orders and in the last year, Domestic Abuse Protection Orders are currently being piloted under the Domestic Abuse Act 2021.

     

    What are the benefits of a Non-Molestation order?

    Empowerment – A non-molestation order can empower the person obtaining the order by giving them a choice in how and when they access protection and on their own terms.

    Criminal Enforcement – It is a criminal offence to breach a non-molestation order. This gives the person extra protection as the breach can be prosecuted if it is difficult to obtain the burden of proof required for a criminal offence such as an assault. Of course, there will be a lower penalty for the offence of a breach of an order than that of an assault, but it will still create a criminal record which can be picked up during a Claire’s Law disclosure and may turn up on DBS checks. Repeated breaches may result in further charges and even a custodial sentence.

    Flexibility – Non-Molestation orders can be flexible protection for both the victim and their children and can include extra measures such as exclusion zones to the order which prohibits the abuser to be on certain streets or/and areas and can also include conditions regarding communication if required.

    Speed – They are quick to obtain and can be applied for on an emergency basis, this is integral for the immediate safety and protection of that person and intersecting the cycle of abuse they may experience (where the abuser constantly contacts and stalks that person after an incident) reducing the chances of reconciliation.

    Police Deterrence – The threat of police enforcement due to a breach can be effective in reducing abuse. This could be because of varying factors – maybe it is the first time the perpetrator has officially heard that their behaviour is unacceptable, or they may not want to get involved in the criminal justice system as there may be consequences such as losing their job. Civil orders extend the ‘tool kit’ available for police and other services to protect people and manage the perpetrator’s behaviour.

    Recovery Space – Provides space for the person to recover, get support from local services or peer support programmes, acknowledge their options, understand what has happened, realise it is not their fault, and begin to move forward.

    Lower Evidence Threshold – In civil law, less evidence is needed to obtain a Non-Molestation order, as the burden of proof is based on the ‘balance of probabilities’ rather than proving that something has happened ‘beyond all reasonable doubt’— the threshold required in criminal law. This makes civil orders a valid alternative option for the victim-survivor if an incident has been reported to the police and dropped due to lack of evidence.

    No Police Report Needed – An incident doesn’t need to be reported to the police to obtain a civil protective order. However, if the order is contested, evidence of reporting to the police or other organisations can be useful.

     

    The benefits of NCDV in assisting to obtain a civil order

    NCDV understands domestic abuse; our staff are trained and trauma informed. We are sensitive to each person’s situation and do not judge or discourage anyone in need of protection. If someone isn’t ready, they can recontact us when they are.

    Obtaining Non-Molestation orders and Domestic Abuse Protection Orders (in pilot areas) is all we do, day in, and day out. Because of this, we have really streamlined our process to make it as quick and efficient as possible.

    A breach of a protective order can only be acted on if the police know that one is in place. Once the order is granted and served on the perpetrator, a copy of the order is sent to the victim-survivor’s local police force and a copy is placed on our ASSIST database, a system where all orders obtained by NCDV are uploaded and accessible to police officers 24/7.

    NCDV have been around since 2002 and currently obtain approximately 30% of all the non-molestation and occupation orders in England & Wales.

    If someone isn’t eligible for Legal Aid, we have the largest pro bono team in the country to assist them free of charge.

    NCDV also signpost the victim/survivor to relevant services who can offer further advice or/and emotional and practical support.

     

    On a final note

    Obtaining a protective order is a critical step in helping victim-survivors break free from abuse and begin their recovery. An order can significantly reduce further harm and be a positive first step in the complexity of domestic abuse. This is not something everyone is automatically aware of, but incredibly useful to know about, and also inform others about, as an option that is available.

    Further information on NCDV and the orders we obtain for those experiencing domestic abuse can be accessed via out free training sessions which can be joined individually or arranged for a team via About Our Training – NCDV.

     

    Julia Gatie

    Training Team Manager, NCDV

     

    This blog is for general information only and does not constitute legal advice.

    Share This Article

    Reading Time: 3 minutes
    Reading Time: 3 minutes
    Reading Time: 5 minutes

    By Fiona Bawden, Times Online (8th May 2007)

    “Steve Connor, a student at City Law School, is a man on a mission. Six years ago he was a fairly directionless 27-year-old. Today, as well as taking the Bar Vocational Course, he is chairman of the National Centre for Domestic Violence, a ground-breaking organisation that he dragged into existence after a friend could not get legal help to protect her from an abusive partner.

    Connor’s route to the Bar has been circuitous. In 2001 he returned from a year in Australia (he says that he would not dignify describing it as a gap year), and took a job as a process server in South London. The job (“I just saw it advertised in the paper”) was not quite as dull as it sounds. On one occasion he was threatened with a machete, on another, he was nearly stabbed by a man he had arranged to meet on Clapham Common to serve with a non-molestation order: “He’d seemed really friendly on the phone…”

    The turning point in his life came when a friend, who was being abused by her partner, turned to him for support. Connor went with her to the police. She did not want to press criminal charges so the police suggested that she visit a solicitor to take out a civil injunction. “We must have seen 12 solicitors in a morning. We just went from one to the next to the next to the next. Everyone was very eager to help until we sat down to fill in the forms for the legal aid means test,” he says. The woman, who had a small child, did not qualify for public funding. But, Connor says, her financial situation as it appeared on paper did not bear any relation to her financial situation in reality. “She had a part-time job and she and her partner owned their home. Yet she didn’t have any money. Her boyfriend was very controlling and controlled all the money; he kept the chequebooks and didn’t let her have access to the bank account.”

    The injustice of the situation got under Connor’s skin. “I just couldn’t believe that there was no help available to people who did not qualify for public funds but could not afford to pay.

    I just kept feeling that this must be able to be sorted if only someone would address it.”That “someone” turned out to be him.

    In 2002, thanks entirely to Connor’s doggedness, the London Centre for Domestic Violence was formed. It started out with him and a friend, but is now a national organisation, covering 27 counties, and has helped approximately 10,000 victims last year to take out injunctions against their partners.

    NCDV now has nine full-time staff, 12 permanent volunteers and has trained over 5000 law and other students as McKenzie Friends to accompany unrepresented victims into court. We have also trained over 8000 police officers in civil remedies available regarding domestic violence. The National Centre for Domestic Violence (NCDV) has branches in London, Guildford and Manchester and is on track to have branches in 16 areas within the next two years.

    NCDV specialises exclusively in domestic violence work and could be characterised as a cross between McDonald’s and Claims Direct. The high degree of specialisation means that its processes are streamlined: clients can be seen quickly and the work is done speedily and cheaply. “Sometimes, we will have one of our trained McKenzie Friends at a court doing 10 applications in one day,” Connor says.

    Clients are not charged for the service. NCDV staff take an initial statement: clients who qualify for legal aid are referred to a local firm; those that don’t get free help from the centre itself. It runs on a shoestring, heavily reliant on volunteers and capping staff salaries at £18,000 a year.

    Steve expects to qualify as a barrister this summer and hopes that having a formal legal qualification will give the centre added clout. “We are already acknowledged as experts and consulted at a high level, so I thought it would be helpful if I could back that up by being able to say I’m a barrister,” he says. He is just about to complete a one-year full-time BVC course at the City Law School (formerly the Inns of Court Law School) and, all being well, should be called to the Bar in July. Although Connor sees his long-term future as a barrister, he says that he has no immediate plans to practise. “I want to get NCDV running on a fully national level. Then I may take a step back and have a career at the Bar.”