National Centre for Domestic Violence Logo

Please note that Internet Explorer is no longer a supported browser so we cannot guarantee the integrity of our website when using it. Please use an alternate browser like Edge or Chrome.

Access ASSIST Online Injunction Database

Click here to leave training feedback

-or-

Make a Referral Using the Form Below:









    YesNo


    YesNo
    *Fields required. By submitting a referral you agree to receive updates on the progress of your referral, as outlined in our Privacy Policy.

    Restraining Order V Non-Molestation Order

    Reading Time: 2 minutes

    Restraining Order V Non-Molestation Order

    emblem

    Many people ask me – “what is the difference between a restraining order and a non-molestation order? It confuses many and with good reason. And to add even more confusion there are orders called Undertakings as well! but I will deal with Undertakings in my next blog. For now, lets concentrate on Restraining Orders and Non-Molestation Orders.

    The main difference between a restraining order and a non-molestation order is that a restraining order is given in the criminal court, so a Magistrates Court or Crown Court, and a non-molestation order is granted in the civil or family court. Both do roughly the same thing. They can both have various clauses within them to stop them doing things such as:

    • Contacting someone in any way
    • Physically assaulting someone
    • Harassing someone over the phone or via social media
    • Following someone on the street
    • Anything else that puts someone in fear of their safety

    The fundamental difference between the two is:

    A restraining order can be given by a criminal court after a conviction for any criminal offence. They are made in respect of the alleged perpetrator or what is known in a criminal court as ‘the defendant’ – not the victim. They are appropriate where the victim and the defendant are known to each other. A restraining order is a preventative and protective measure. A restraining order can also be given when someone is acquitted. This is known as a Section 5A PHA 1997 and was introduced for when it is clear that a victim needs protection but there is not enough evidence to convict on the evidence brought before the court. Restraining orders on acquittal are civil behaviour orders and therefore the standard of proof is a civil one*. A restraining order can last for 12 months but could be longer and/or indefinite, given the degree of severity for which it has been given in the first place.

    A Non-Molestation order is given in a civil or family court. They are made in respect of the victim, not the perpetrator. A non-molestation order does not involve the police unless it is breached by the perpetrator. It has a ‘power of arrest’ and if the order is breached the police can arrest the perpetrator and take them to court. If the breach is proven, the perpetrator can then be charged with a criminal offence which could mean a prison sentence of up to 5 years or a fine or both. A prison sentence may not be given for what is deemed a minor breach but should still be reported as if there are many minor breaches, this can sometimes constitute a major breach over time. A non-molestation order usually lasts from between 6-12 months but sometimes they can be ‘until further notice’.

    Sharon Bryan
    Head Of Partnerships & Development Of Domestic Abuse Services

    Share This Article

    Reading Time: 2 minutes
    Reading Time: 2 minutes
    Reading Time: 2 minutes

    By Fiona Bawden, Times Online (8th May 2007)

    “Steve Connor, a student at City Law School, is a man on a mission. Six years ago he was a fairly directionless 27-year-old. Today, as well as taking the Bar Vocational Course, he is chairman of the National Centre for Domestic Violence, a ground-breaking organisation that he dragged into existence after a friend could not get legal help to protect her from an abusive partner.

    Connor’s route to the Bar has been circuitous. In 2001 he returned from a year in Australia (he says that he would not dignify describing it as a gap year), and took a job as a process server in South London. The job (“I just saw it advertised in the paper”) was not quite as dull as it sounds. On one occasion he was threatened with a machete, on another, he was nearly stabbed by a man he had arranged to meet on Clapham Common to serve with a non-molestation order: “He’d seemed really friendly on the phone…”

    The turning point in his life came when a friend, who was being abused by her partner, turned to him for support. Connor went with her to the police. She did not want to press criminal charges so the police suggested that she visit a solicitor to take out a civil injunction. “We must have seen 12 solicitors in a morning. We just went from one to the next to the next to the next. Everyone was very eager to help until we sat down to fill in the forms for the legal aid means test,” he says. The woman, who had a small child, did not qualify for public funding. But, Connor says, her financial situation as it appeared on paper did not bear any relation to her financial situation in reality. “She had a part-time job and she and her partner owned their home. Yet she didn’t have any money. Her boyfriend was very controlling and controlled all the money; he kept the chequebooks and didn’t let her have access to the bank account.”

    The injustice of the situation got under Connor’s skin. “I just couldn’t believe that there was no help available to people who did not qualify for public funds but could not afford to pay.

    I just kept feeling that this must be able to be sorted if only someone would address it.”That “someone” turned out to be him.

    In 2002, thanks entirely to Connor’s doggedness, the London Centre for Domestic Violence was formed. It started out with him and a friend, but is now a national organisation, covering 27 counties, and has helped approximately 10,000 victims last year to take out injunctions against their partners.

    NCDV now has nine full-time staff, 12 permanent volunteers and has trained over 5000 law and other students as McKenzie Friends to accompany unrepresented victims into court. We have also trained over 8000 police officers in civil remedies available regarding domestic violence. The National Centre for Domestic Violence (NCDV) has branches in London, Guildford and Manchester and is on track to have branches in 16 areas within the next two years.

    NCDV specialises exclusively in domestic violence work and could be characterised as a cross between McDonald’s and Claims Direct. The high degree of specialisation means that its processes are streamlined: clients can be seen quickly and the work is done speedily and cheaply. “Sometimes, we will have one of our trained McKenzie Friends at a court doing 10 applications in one day,” Connor says.

    Clients are not charged for the service. NCDV staff take an initial statement: clients who qualify for legal aid are referred to a local firm; those that don’t get free help from the centre itself. It runs on a shoestring, heavily reliant on volunteers and capping staff salaries at £18,000 a year.

    Steve expects to qualify as a barrister this summer and hopes that having a formal legal qualification will give the centre added clout. “We are already acknowledged as experts and consulted at a high level, so I thought it would be helpful if I could back that up by being able to say I’m a barrister,” he says. He is just about to complete a one-year full-time BVC course at the City Law School (formerly the Inns of Court Law School) and, all being well, should be called to the Bar in July. Although Connor sees his long-term future as a barrister, he says that he has no immediate plans to practise. “I want to get NCDV running on a fully national level. Then I may take a step back and have a career at the Bar.”