National Centre for Domestic Violence Logo

Please note that Internet Explorer is no longer a supported browser so we cannot guarantee the integrity of our website when using it. Please use an alternate browser like Edge or Chrome.

Access ASSIST Online Injunction Database

Click here to leave training feedback

-or-

Make a Referral Using the Form Below:









    YesNo


    YesNo
    *Fields required. By submitting a referral you agree to receive updates on the progress of your referral, as outlined in our Privacy Policy.

    Public Perceptions of Domestic Abuse Are Unhelpful

    Reading Time: 5 minutes

    Public Perceptions of Domestic Abuse Are Unhelpful

    emblem

    Over the Easter break I bumped into an old acquaintance at the gym. After working off some of the chocolate eggs, we caught up in the jacuzzi where she told me her daughter had recently left an abusive relationship. The reason, she told me, is because her daughter has “terrible taste” in men. It turns out this is the third controlling relationship she has left in the last few years.

    Despite the concern etched on her face, and the love she clearly holds for her child, there was absolutely no blame directed at the abusive partners, or acknowledgement of the courage it must have taken to escape three abusive men in the space of a decade. She seemed to believe it was all her daughter’s failing for making bad choices.

    It made me think of my own early relationships and how I believed that I, too, had “terrible taste” when choosing partners. For years, I felt guilt about the trouble I put myself and my family through and wondered why I didn’t have more natural insight. My poor choices in life were echoed in how I refused to attend school, left home early and went on to develop an eating disorder and a mental health problem.

    It took some years maturing and reflecting to realise that all these things were related. My awful experiences of teenage domestic abuse left me broken, and it took a long time to mend myself and realise there had been absolutely nothing wrong with me or my choices; that we are never responsible for someone else’s abuse.

    Domestic abuse is not an event, it’s a process, and it usually starts with grooming. No one gets a punch to the nose on a first date and decides this person is the love of their life. On the contrary, we are sucked in by someone who presents as credible and charming. We think we’ve met the person of our dreams…this might be the one.

    And like any fairy tale, these types of relationships are often whirlwind romances so by the time the abusive behaviour surfaces, we are already heavily invested and may even be married to, living with, or sharing a child with them. We are stuck in a relationship that began as a dream but is quickly unravelling into our worst nightmare. When we finally escape, bloodied and bruised (sometimes literally) we are acutely vulnerable to the next controlling person who will abuse our trust. This is why some people have a series of abusive partners. And yet, we are made to believe this is our own fault for making poor choices and having “terrible taste”.

    The report, Come Together to End Domestic Abuse: a survey of UK attitudes to domestic abuse 2022 published by Women’s Aid Federation of England, suggests that public attitudes about domestic abuse are still influenced by sexist attitudes towards women. Sexual abuse of a woman by her male partner is particularly downplayed. This leads me to pose the question: does there remain a tendency in society to blame the victim for their own abuse? Are men judged by the same standards? Possibly, they are.

    Without a shift in public perception, addressing domestic abuse will remain challenging. Instead of blaming the survivor, we should be putting the blame firmly where it lies, with the abuser. We need to be more empathic and understand that anyone can be groomed. We have to accept that domestic abuse makes us more vulnerable to further abuse by other partners. Finally, we should realise that domestic abuse does not happen because of the survivor’s poor choices, but because the person who is meant to love and care for us chooses to abuse their power and betray our trust. It’s that simple.

    If you want to read the Women’s Aid report you can find it at: https://www.womensaid.org.uk/wp-content/uploads/2022/10/Final-Come-Together-to-End-Domestic-Abuse-a-survey-of-UK-attitudes-to-domestic-abuse-2022-1.pdf

    Over the Easter break I bumped into an old acquaintance at the gym. After working off some of the chocolate eggs, we caught up in the jacuzzi where she told me her daughter had recently left an abusive relationship. The reason, she told me, is because her daughter has “terrible taste” in men. It turns out this is the third controlling relationship she has left in the last few years.

    Despite the concern etched on her face, and the love she clearly holds for her child, there was absolutely no blame directed at the abusive partners, or acknowledgement of the courage it must have taken to escape three abusive men in the space of a decade. She seemed to believe it was all her daughter’s failing for making bad choices.

    It made me think of my own early relationships and how I believed that I, too, had “terrible taste” when choosing partners. For years, I felt guilt about the trouble I put myself and my family through and wondered why I didn’t have more natural insight. My poor choices in life were echoed in how I refused to attend school, left home early and went on to develop an eating disorder and a mental health problem.

    It took some years maturing and reflecting to realise that all these things were related. My awful experiences of teenage domestic abuse left me broken, and it took a long time to mend myself and realise there had been absolutely nothing wrong with me or my choices; that we are never responsible for someone else’s abuse.

    Domestic abuse is not an event, it’s a process, and it usually starts with grooming. No one gets a punch to the nose on a first date and decides this person is the love of their life. On the contrary, we are sucked in by someone who presents as credible and charming. We think we’ve met the person of our dreams…this might be the one.

    And like any fairy tale, these types of relationships are often whirlwind romances so by the time the abusive behaviour surfaces, we are already heavily invested and may even be married to, living with, or sharing a child with them. We are stuck in a relationship that began as a dream but is quickly unravelling into our worst nightmare. When we finally escape, bloodied and bruised (sometimes literally) we are acutely vulnerable to the next controlling person who will abuse our trust. This is why some people have a series of abusive partners. And yet, we are made to believe this is our own fault for making poor choices and having “terrible taste”.

    The report, Come Together to End Domestic Abuse: a survey of UK attitudes to domestic abuse 2022 published by Women’s Aid Federation of England, suggests that public attitudes about domestic abuse are still influenced by sexist attitudes towards women. Sexual abuse of a woman by her male partner is particularly downplayed. This leads me to pose the question: does there remain a tendency in society to blame the victim for their own abuse? Are men judged by the same standards? Possibly, they are.

    Without a shift in public perception, addressing domestic abuse will remain challenging. Instead of blaming the survivor, we should be putting the blame firmly where it lies, with the abuser. We need to be more empathic and understand that anyone can be groomed. We have to accept that domestic abuse makes us more vulnerable to further abuse by other partners. Finally, we should realise that domestic abuse does not happen because of the survivor’s poor choices, but because the person who is meant to love and care for us chooses to abuse their power and betray our trust. It’s that simple.

    If you want to read the Women’s Aid report you can find it at: https://www.womensaid.org.uk/wp-content/uploads/2022/10/Final-Come-Together-to-End-Domestic-Abuse-a-survey-of-UK-attitudes-to-domestic-abuse-2022-1.pdf

     

    Charlotte Woodward

    National Training Manager, NCDV

    Share This Article

    Reading Time: 2 minutes
    Reading Time: 2 minutes
    Reading Time: 2 minutes

    By Fiona Bawden, Times Online (8th May 2007)

    “Steve Connor, a student at City Law School, is a man on a mission. Six years ago he was a fairly directionless 27-year-old. Today, as well as taking the Bar Vocational Course, he is chairman of the National Centre for Domestic Violence, a ground-breaking organisation that he dragged into existence after a friend could not get legal help to protect her from an abusive partner.

    Connor’s route to the Bar has been circuitous. In 2001 he returned from a year in Australia (he says that he would not dignify describing it as a gap year), and took a job as a process server in South London. The job (“I just saw it advertised in the paper”) was not quite as dull as it sounds. On one occasion he was threatened with a machete, on another, he was nearly stabbed by a man he had arranged to meet on Clapham Common to serve with a non-molestation order: “He’d seemed really friendly on the phone…”

    The turning point in his life came when a friend, who was being abused by her partner, turned to him for support. Connor went with her to the police. She did not want to press criminal charges so the police suggested that she visit a solicitor to take out a civil injunction. “We must have seen 12 solicitors in a morning. We just went from one to the next to the next to the next. Everyone was very eager to help until we sat down to fill in the forms for the legal aid means test,” he says. The woman, who had a small child, did not qualify for public funding. But, Connor says, her financial situation as it appeared on paper did not bear any relation to her financial situation in reality. “She had a part-time job and she and her partner owned their home. Yet she didn’t have any money. Her boyfriend was very controlling and controlled all the money; he kept the chequebooks and didn’t let her have access to the bank account.”

    The injustice of the situation got under Connor’s skin. “I just couldn’t believe that there was no help available to people who did not qualify for public funds but could not afford to pay.

    I just kept feeling that this must be able to be sorted if only someone would address it.”That “someone” turned out to be him.

    In 2002, thanks entirely to Connor’s doggedness, the London Centre for Domestic Violence was formed. It started out with him and a friend, but is now a national organisation, covering 27 counties, and has helped approximately 10,000 victims last year to take out injunctions against their partners.

    NCDV now has nine full-time staff, 12 permanent volunteers and has trained over 5000 law and other students as McKenzie Friends to accompany unrepresented victims into court. We have also trained over 8000 police officers in civil remedies available regarding domestic violence. The National Centre for Domestic Violence (NCDV) has branches in London, Guildford and Manchester and is on track to have branches in 16 areas within the next two years.

    NCDV specialises exclusively in domestic violence work and could be characterised as a cross between McDonald’s and Claims Direct. The high degree of specialisation means that its processes are streamlined: clients can be seen quickly and the work is done speedily and cheaply. “Sometimes, we will have one of our trained McKenzie Friends at a court doing 10 applications in one day,” Connor says.

    Clients are not charged for the service. NCDV staff take an initial statement: clients who qualify for legal aid are referred to a local firm; those that don’t get free help from the centre itself. It runs on a shoestring, heavily reliant on volunteers and capping staff salaries at £18,000 a year.

    Steve expects to qualify as a barrister this summer and hopes that having a formal legal qualification will give the centre added clout. “We are already acknowledged as experts and consulted at a high level, so I thought it would be helpful if I could back that up by being able to say I’m a barrister,” he says. He is just about to complete a one-year full-time BVC course at the City Law School (formerly the Inns of Court Law School) and, all being well, should be called to the Bar in July. Although Connor sees his long-term future as a barrister, he says that he has no immediate plans to practise. “I want to get NCDV running on a fully national level. Then I may take a step back and have a career at the Bar.”