National Centre for Domestic Violence Logo

Please note that Internet Explorer is no longer a supported browser so we cannot guarantee the integrity of our website when using it. Please use an alternate browser like Edge or Chrome.

Access ASSIST Online Injunction Database

Click here to leave training feedback

-or-

Make a Referral Using the Form Below:









    YesNo


    YesNo
    *Fields required. By submitting a referral you agree to receive updates on the progress of your referral, as outlined in our Privacy Policy.

    Women in Prison

    Reading Time: 3 minutes

    Women in Prison

    emblem

    NCDV’s mission is to make domestic abuse and violence socially unacceptable. We want everyone to be safe and that includes people who are seen to be marginally excluded. With this in mind, I want to shine a light on a subject that is very important to me; domestic abuse and women in prison. As part of my role at the National Centre for Domestic Violence (NCDV), I manage the Prison Partnership. There are 13 women’s prisons in England and to date NCDV work in partnership with 8 of them. Together with my colleague Kirsty, who is the Head of Family Law at NCDV’s sister company, National Legal Service, we aim to support women in prison to be able to get protective court injunctions so that when they are released from prison, they are protected from their abuser.

    To give some background, 57% of women in prison report having experienced domestic abuse, but the actual number is likely to be much more than this. Often, the crimes which have led to them being in prison are the result of the domestic abuse they have experienced or associated with it. Women become trapped in a vicious cycle of criminal activity and victimisation. Their circumstances are often made worse by poor mental health, substance misuse or poverty. Leaving an abusive relationship is very risky and potentially life threatening, and we know that the point in which a woman is planning to escape or actually leaving is the most dangerous time for her and it is at this time that many women are killed by their abusers.

    One may think that one of the few benefits of being sent to prison for some women, is that they will be able to escape their abuser.  In fact, many women prisoners continue to be at risk of coercive control and/or physical danger from those that they cannot avoid on release. Yet, historically, the courts will assume that because a woman is in prison, she is not at risk – this just isn’t the case. When women in prison apply for non-molestation orders from within prison, the court will deem them to be low risk, because they are in prison and separated from the abuser and therefore do not grant the protection orders.

    There is a world of difference between someone leaving an abusive relationship and perhaps going into refuge or protecting themselves with protective orders ‘outside’ prison, and a woman who has been incarcerated in prison. She has not necessarily separated from the abuser, there has merely been temporary barriers put between the abuser and the victim.

    We know from our work with the prisons that a large percentage of women in prison are gate met by their abusers when they are released and this is how the vicious cycle of criminal activity and revictimisation happens. I know of women who are ‘controlled’ every bit as much inside prison, as they are when they are not in prison, if not more. For these women, prison IS their refuge! Whilst they are in prison, they are safe. Is it any wonder that they commit more crime once released?

    Another problem for these women is that there are very few people who will look beyond the crimes that they have committed. They will judge these women, solely because they are, or have been, in prison and I believe that is wrong. These women tell us they feel unheard. They feel they have not got a voice. What chance do they have?

    Of course, if someone commits a crime, then they need to be held accountable and punished for the offence they have committed. My point is that domestic abuse and violence is WRONG and can happen to anyone. It does not matter whether you are a wealthy upstanding citizen and pillar of the community or in prison, everyone should be listened to and treated fairly.

    Sharon Bryan

    Head of Partnerships and Development

     

    Share This Article

    Reading Time: 4 minutes
    Reading Time: 2 minutes

    By Fiona Bawden, Times Online (8th May 2007)

    “Steve Connor, a student at City Law School, is a man on a mission. Six years ago he was a fairly directionless 27-year-old. Today, as well as taking the Bar Vocational Course, he is chairman of the National Centre for Domestic Violence, a ground-breaking organisation that he dragged into existence after a friend could not get legal help to protect her from an abusive partner.

    Connor’s route to the Bar has been circuitous. In 2001 he returned from a year in Australia (he says that he would not dignify describing it as a gap year), and took a job as a process server in South London. The job (“I just saw it advertised in the paper”) was not quite as dull as it sounds. On one occasion he was threatened with a machete, on another, he was nearly stabbed by a man he had arranged to meet on Clapham Common to serve with a non-molestation order: “He’d seemed really friendly on the phone…”

    The turning point in his life came when a friend, who was being abused by her partner, turned to him for support. Connor went with her to the police. She did not want to press criminal charges so the police suggested that she visit a solicitor to take out a civil injunction. “We must have seen 12 solicitors in a morning. We just went from one to the next to the next to the next. Everyone was very eager to help until we sat down to fill in the forms for the legal aid means test,” he says. The woman, who had a small child, did not qualify for public funding. But, Connor says, her financial situation as it appeared on paper did not bear any relation to her financial situation in reality. “She had a part-time job and she and her partner owned their home. Yet she didn’t have any money. Her boyfriend was very controlling and controlled all the money; he kept the chequebooks and didn’t let her have access to the bank account.”

    The injustice of the situation got under Connor’s skin. “I just couldn’t believe that there was no help available to people who did not qualify for public funds but could not afford to pay.

    I just kept feeling that this must be able to be sorted if only someone would address it.”That “someone” turned out to be him.

    In 2002, thanks entirely to Connor’s doggedness, the London Centre for Domestic Violence was formed. It started out with him and a friend, but is now a national organisation, covering 27 counties, and has helped approximately 10,000 victims last year to take out injunctions against their partners.

    NCDV now has nine full-time staff, 12 permanent volunteers and has trained over 5000 law and other students as McKenzie Friends to accompany unrepresented victims into court. We have also trained over 8000 police officers in civil remedies available regarding domestic violence. The National Centre for Domestic Violence (NCDV) has branches in London, Guildford and Manchester and is on track to have branches in 16 areas within the next two years.

    NCDV specialises exclusively in domestic violence work and could be characterised as a cross between McDonald’s and Claims Direct. The high degree of specialisation means that its processes are streamlined: clients can be seen quickly and the work is done speedily and cheaply. “Sometimes, we will have one of our trained McKenzie Friends at a court doing 10 applications in one day,” Connor says.

    Clients are not charged for the service. NCDV staff take an initial statement: clients who qualify for legal aid are referred to a local firm; those that don’t get free help from the centre itself. It runs on a shoestring, heavily reliant on volunteers and capping staff salaries at £18,000 a year.

    Steve expects to qualify as a barrister this summer and hopes that having a formal legal qualification will give the centre added clout. “We are already acknowledged as experts and consulted at a high level, so I thought it would be helpful if I could back that up by being able to say I’m a barrister,” he says. He is just about to complete a one-year full-time BVC course at the City Law School (formerly the Inns of Court Law School) and, all being well, should be called to the Bar in July. Although Connor sees his long-term future as a barrister, he says that he has no immediate plans to practise. “I want to get NCDV running on a fully national level. Then I may take a step back and have a career at the Bar.”